VIOV vs. SMIG
VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) and SMIG (Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. VIOV is passively managed, while SMIG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIOV returned 14.29%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for SMIG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SMIG.
Performance
VIOV vs. SMIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than SMIG's 10.18% return.
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
SMIG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV vs. SMIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | 5.05% |
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 10.18% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOV and SMIG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VIOV and SMIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIOV vs. SMIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOV
SMIG
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
VIOV
SMIG
Consumer Cyclical
VIOV
SMIG
Industrials
VIOV
SMIG
Technology
VIOV
SMIG
Energy
VIOV
SMIG
Real Estate
VIOV
SMIG
Healthcare
VIOV
SMIG
Basic Materials
VIOV
SMIG
Consumer Defensive
VIOV
SMIG
Communication Services
VIOV
SMIG
Utilities
VIOV
SMIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOV vs. SMIG — Risk / Return Rank
VIOV
SMIG
VIOV vs. SMIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIOV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 0.99 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 1.53 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 1.39 | +2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 3.62 | +9.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIOV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.99 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
VIOV vs. SMIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than SMIG's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and SMIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -19.65% | -27.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -8.52% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.44% | -19.23% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -1.79% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -6.55% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.27% | -0.41% |
Volatility
VIOV vs. SMIG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) at 3.65%. This indicates that VIOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.65% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 8.43% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 11.98% | +6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 16.20% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 16.20% | +7.69% |
VIOV vs. SMIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIOV vs. SMIG - Dividend Comparison
VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than SMIG's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.75% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIOV and SMIG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SMIG (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs SMIG's -19.65%.
On 3-year performance, VIOV leads with 14.29% vs 13.09% for SMIG. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SMIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VIOV has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMIG.
SMIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.59% for VIOV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOV and 0.60% for SMIG.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOV and SMIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer