VIOV vs. FDGRX
VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) and FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) are both funds - VIOV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. VIOV is passively managed, while FDGRX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIOV returned 10.38%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for FDGRX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FDGRX.
Performance
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 22.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VIOV has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.23% annualized return.
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 38.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
FDGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 22.31%
- 6M
- 20.57%
- 1Y
- 46.04%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 23.23%
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 16.31% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | 30.67% | 2.81% | 24.44% | -12.85% | 11.54% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 22.31% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOV and FDGRX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VIOV and FDGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOV
FDGRX
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VIOV
FDGRX
Consumer Cyclical
VIOV
FDGRX
Industrials
VIOV
FDGRX
Technology
VIOV
FDGRX
Energy
VIOV
FDGRX
Real Estate
VIOV
FDGRX
Healthcare
VIOV
FDGRX
Basic Materials
VIOV
FDGRX
Consumer Defensive
VIOV
FDGRX
Communication Services
VIOV
FDGRX
Utilities
VIOV
FDGRX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOV vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank
VIOV
FDGRX
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIOV | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.60 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 13.24 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and FDGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOV | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -71.62% | +24.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -12.60% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.44% | -26.19% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | -40.25% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.36% | -40.25% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -1.17% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -15.89% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.42% | -0.58% |
Volatility
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) is 5.15%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that VIOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOV | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 7.29% | -2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 15.82% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 19.47% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 24.09% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 23.47% | +0.43% |
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIOV vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison
VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIOV and FDGRX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDGRX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to VIOV (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.
FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOV and FDGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer