PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOO vs. FCDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VIOO having a 15.34% return and FCDAX slightly higher at 15.79%. Over the past 10 years, VIOO has underperformed FCDAX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while FCDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


VIOO

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.64%
YTD
15.34%
6M
14.20%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.67%

FCDAX

1D
0.83%
1M
0.96%
YTD
15.79%
6M
14.35%
1Y
38.50%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
15.34%6.04%8.48%16.16%-16.26%26.79%11.47%22.68%-8.65%13.16%
FCDAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A
15.79%14.04%14.16%19.09%-18.47%24.38%21.39%30.05%-9.16%11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOO and FCDAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VIOO and FCDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOO vs. FCDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOO
VIOO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FCDAX
FCDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FCDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOOFCDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

4.08

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

15.85

-3.71

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FCDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOO and FCDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOOFCDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.30

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.45

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.34

+0.23

Drawdowns

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOO drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, smaller than the maximum FCDAX drawdown of -65.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOO and FCDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOOFCDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.15%

-65.62%

+21.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-10.05%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.93%

-27.50%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.93%

-30.67%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.15%

-38.46%

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.77%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-12.14%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.58%

+0.04%

Volatility

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) is 4.40%, while Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that VIOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOOFCDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.23%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

13.35%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

17.83%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

21.59%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

21.86%

+1.13%

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FCDAX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOO vs. FCDAX - Dividend Comparison

VIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than FCDAX's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCDAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A
0.38%0.44%2.61%0.02%0.08%10.93%1.44%1.96%22.71%10.34%1.43%6.93%
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
1.18%1.36%1.48%1.47%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.37%1.32%1.11%1.06%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VIOO and FCDAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCDAX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to VIOO (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOO dropped -44.15% vs FCDAX's -65.62%.

FCDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOO and FCDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer