PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VINAX vs. FCLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VINAX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VINAX achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than FCLCX's 13.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VINAX has outperformed FCLCX with an annualized return of 14.08%, while FCLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.06% annualized return.


VINAX

1D
1.08%
1M
2.61%
YTD
14.92%
6M
15.56%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
14.08%

FCLCX

1D
0.98%
1M
1.35%
YTD
13.19%
6M
14.27%
1Y
25.07%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
15.52%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VINAX
Vanguard Industrials Index Fund Admiral Shares
14.92%18.53%16.95%22.38%-8.51%20.66%12.25%30.16%-13.93%21.50%
FCLCX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C
13.19%23.55%28.16%21.74%-11.33%15.36%10.36%26.81%-16.46%18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VINAX and FCLCX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.97

The correlation between VINAX and FCLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VINAX vs. FCLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VINAX
VINAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VINAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VINAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VINAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VINAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VINAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FCLCX
FCLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FCLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VINAX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VINAXFCLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.02

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

8.12

+1.58

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VINAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FCLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VINAX and FCLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VINAXFCLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.46

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.61

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.49

+0.02

Drawdowns

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VINAX drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FCLCX drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VINAX and FCLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VINAXFCLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.43%

-61.33%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-13.16%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-21.44%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.07%

-26.82%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-42.77%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-2.53%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-8.18%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.27%

-0.33%

Volatility

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Industrials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VINAX) is 5.35%, while Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that VINAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VINAXFCLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.97%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

15.09%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

18.26%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.38%

21.03%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

21.58%

-1.11%

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VINAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLCX's 1.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

VINAX vs. FCLCX - Dividend Comparison

VINAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than FCLCX's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLCX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C
1.94%2.19%9.45%10.59%4.10%24.59%0.68%7.65%13.22%2.98%5.82%9.58%
VINAX
Vanguard Industrials Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.89%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.51%1.06%1.39%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.82%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VINAX and FCLCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCLCX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to VINAX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VINAX dropped -63.43% vs FCLCX's -61.33%.

VINAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VINAX and FCLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer