VIMCX vs. VMFGX
VIMCX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund) and VMFGX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX returned 10.81%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for VMFGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIMCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VMFGX.
Performance
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIMCX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 18.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX has underperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
VIMCX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
VMFGX
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 28.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | -1.53% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 18.55% | 7.43% | 15.86% | 17.42% | -18.99% | 18.83% | 22.61% | 26.20% | -10.39% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIMCX and VMFGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.91 |
The correlation between VIMCX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIMCX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank
VIMCX
VMFGX
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIMCX | VMFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 3.00 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 11.86 | -12.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIMCX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum VMFGX drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMCX and VMFGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIMCX | VMFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -39.15% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -9.91% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.32% | -25.45% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -29.25% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -39.15% | +5.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -1.61% | -6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -5.69% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 2.50% | +2.28% |
Volatility
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) is 5.50%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that VIMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIMCX | VMFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 5.88% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 13.78% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 17.47% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 20.71% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 21.07% | -2.38% |
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIMCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIMCX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison
VIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than VMFGX's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.48% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.59% | 0.70% | 0.84% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 0.53% | 0.79% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 0.93% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIMCX and VMFGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMFGX has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to VIMCX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIMCX dropped -33.92% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.
VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIMCX and VMFGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer