VIK vs. PCG
VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd) and PCG (PG&E Corporation) are both stocks. VIK operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while PCG operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past year, VIK returned 102.20% vs 21.03% for PCG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VIK vs. PCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIK achieves a 40.11% return, which is significantly higher than PCG's 3.78% return.
VIK
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 18.78%
- YTD
- 40.11%
- 6M
- 35.28%
- 1Y
- 102.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 21.03%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- -11.89%
VIK vs. PCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd | 40.11% | 62.07% | 68.49% |
PCG PG&E Corporation | 3.78% | -19.72% | 18.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIK and PCG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
VIK:
$44.61B
PCG:
$37.93B
VIK:
$2.69
PCG:
$1.32
VIK:
37.18
PCG:
12.62
VIK:
6.69
PCG:
1.44
VIK:
41.82
PCG:
0.98
VIK:
$6.66B
PCG:
$25.83B
VIK:
$2.58B
PCG:
$11.87B
VIK:
$1.74B
PCG:
$10.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIK vs. PCG — Risk / Return Rank
VIK
PCG
VIK vs. PCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and PG&E Corporation (PCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIK | PCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.88 | 1.26 | +5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.03 | 2.87 | +16.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIK vs. PCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIK drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum PCG drawdown of -94.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIK and PCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIK | PCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -94.65% | +59.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.94% | -16.82% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -76.24% | +76.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -26.52% | +20.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 7.34% | -1.95% |
Volatility
VIK vs. PCG - Volatility Comparison
Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to PG&E Corporation (PCG) at 6.74%. This indicates that VIK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIK | PCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.18% | 6.74% | +3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.35% | 18.25% | +14.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.11% | 26.38% | +11.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.78% | 28.04% | +12.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.78% | 59.58% | -18.80% |
Dividends
VIK vs. PCG - Dividend Comparison
VIK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCG PG&E Corporation | 0.90% | 0.78% | 0.27% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.46% | 3.17% | 3.42% |
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VIK vs. PCG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Viking Holdings Ltd and PG&E Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VIK vs. PCG - Profitability Comparison
VIK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 284.28M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.
PCG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PG&E Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.85B and revenue of 6.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.
VIK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 12.06M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
PCG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PG&E Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 6.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.
VIK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a net income of -54.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.
PCG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PG&E Corporation reported a net income of 885.00M and revenue of 6.88B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VIK and PCG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIK has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to PCG (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIK dropped -35.39% vs PCG's -94.65%.
VIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIK and PCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer