PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIGRX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth Index Fund Investor Shares (VIGRX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIGRX achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -0.51% return.


VIGRX

1D
2.71%
1M
-1.63%
6M
5.13%
YTD
3.73%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
16.99%
ALL TIME*
11.38%

SWLGX

1D
2.95%
1M
-3.22%
6M
1.04%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIGRX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Investor Shares
3.73%19.18%32.51%46.59%-33.22%27.10%40.01%37.08%-3.47%-1.02%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
-0.51%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VIGRX and SWLGX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.99

The correlation between VIGRX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIGRX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIGRX
VIGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VIGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VIGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth Index Fund Investor Shares (VIGRX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIGRXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.08

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.45

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

1.35

+0.87

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIGRX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIGRX drawdown since its inception was -57.47%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIGRX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGRXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.47%

-32.69%

-24.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-16.16%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.13%

-23.30%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.70%

-32.69%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.62%

-8.74%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-7.03%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

5.37%

-0.19%

Volatility

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth Index Fund Investor Shares (VIGRX) is 5.40%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that VIGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGRXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

6.40%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

14.03%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

17.49%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

21.80%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

22.68%

-0.99%

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIGRX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIGRX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

VIGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SWLGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIGRX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Investor Shares
0.27%0.22%0.35%0.47%0.54%0.36%0.56%0.83%1.18%1.03%1.27%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VIGRX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWLGX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to VIGRX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIGRX dropped -57.47% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

VIGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIGRX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer