PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIDMX vs. LZEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Developing Markets Fund (VIDMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIDMX achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 21.89% return.


VIDMX

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
5.22%
6M
5.42%
1Y
11.42%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

LZEMX

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
21.89%
6M
22.38%
1Y
43.20%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VIDMX
Virtus KAR Developing Markets Fund
5.22%27.21%5.26%15.44%-21.26%-5.95%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
21.89%41.35%7.60%22.44%-14.86%-4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VIDMX and LZEMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.77

The correlation between VIDMX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIDMX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIDMX
VIDMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VIDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VIDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LZEMX
LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Developing Markets Fund (VIDMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIDMXLZEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.57

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.28

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

15.14

-11.42

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIDMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIDMX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIDMX drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIDMX and LZEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIDMXLZEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-60.08%

+25.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-10.42%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.97%

-14.27%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

-29.13%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-4.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-16.60%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.94%

+0.35%

Volatility

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus KAR Developing Markets Fund (VIDMX) is 5.06%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that VIDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIDMXLZEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

6.02%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

12.23%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

14.25%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

14.50%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

16.37%

-1.53%

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIDMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIDMX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

VIDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than LZEMX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
1.68%2.05%3.11%3.76%5.92%4.89%2.11%2.45%2.10%1.99%1.48%2.14%
VIDMX
Virtus KAR Developing Markets Fund
2.42%2.55%1.94%2.32%1.30%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIDMX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZEMX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to VIDMX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIDMX dropped -35.00% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIDMX and LZEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer