PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VICSX vs. JMABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VICSX vs. JMABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VICSX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICSX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than JMABX's -0.07% return.


VICSX

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.04%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
2.40%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.66%
ALL TIME*
4.26%

JMABX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.14%
6M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VICSX vs. JMABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VICSX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
-0.51%9.36%3.66%8.88%-14.09%-1.56%9.52%3.59%
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
-0.07%8.88%4.42%8.05%-15.50%0.33%7.74%2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VICSX and JMABX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019

0.93

The correlation between VICSX and JMABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VICSX vs. JMABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VICSX
VICSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JMABX
JMABX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JMABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMABX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JMABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMABX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VICSX vs. JMABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VICSX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VICSXJMABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.45

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

4.71

-1.67

VICSX vs. JMABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the JMABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICSX and JMABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VICSX vs. JMABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICSX drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, roughly equal to the maximum JMABX drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICSX and JMABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VICSXJMABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-21.48%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-2.89%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.22%

-5.27%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.46%

-21.43%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-1.53%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-6.07%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.89%

+0.18%

Volatility

VICSX vs. JMABX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VICSX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) at 0.84%. This indicates that VICSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VICSXJMABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.84%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

2.69%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

3.50%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.17%

5.51%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

5.83%

-0.49%

VICSX vs. JMABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VICSX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than JMABX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VICSX vs. JMABX - Dividend Comparison

VICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than JMABX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
5.21%5.59%5.26%3.59%3.28%3.99%2.74%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VICSX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.42%4.59%4.77%3.70%3.00%2.76%2.77%3.35%3.62%3.22%3.03%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VICSX and JMABX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VICSX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to JMABX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICSX dropped -20.53% vs JMABX's -21.48%.

JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VICSX and JMABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer