VICE vs. RTH
VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and RTH (VanEck Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. VICE is actively managed, while RTH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned 1.67%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for RTH. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
VICE vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 7.50% return.
VICE
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- -4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.50%
RTH
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.33M | $1.20M | $1.33M | |
| $15.61K | $15.90K | $15.22K |
VICE vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 4.78% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 22.45% | 20.05% | -16.93% | 4.19% |
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 7.50% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICE and RTH is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VICE and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VICE vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VICE
RTH
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VICE
RTH
Consumer Defensive
VICE
RTH
Communication Services
VICE
RTH
-
Real Estate
VICE
RTH
-
Basic Materials
VICE
RTH
-
Technology
VICE
RTH
-
Energy
VICE
-
RTH
-
Financial Services
VICE
-
RTH
-
Healthcare
VICE
-
RTH
Industrials
VICE
-
RTH
Utilities
VICE
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICE vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
VICE
RTH
VICE vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VICE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.17 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.57 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 4.34 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VICE vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum RTH drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -42.32% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -7.83% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -13.80% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.92% | -25.00% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -0.65% | -6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -7.32% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 2.83% | +5.34% |
Volatility
VICE vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.42%, while VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.18% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 10.54% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 13.28% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 16.96% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 17.62% | +1.50% |
VICE vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VICE vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than RTH's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 0.90% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VICE and RTH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RTH has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 5-year performance, RTH leads with 9.75% vs 1.67% for VICE. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RTH has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.75% for VICE.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICE and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer