VICE vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned -0.32%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EATZ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

VICE vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's 4.80% return.

VICE

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: -1.03%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: -0.32%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: -6.88%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VICE vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	3.62%	1.56%	18.27%	3.01%	-18.28%	-5.66%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VICE and EATZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between VICE and EATZ has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VICE vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VICE	EATZ
Consumer Defensive	41.7%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	27.8%	78.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	2.3%
Real Estate	8.9%	-
Basic Materials	7.5%	-
Technology	4.9%	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VICE vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VICE

VICE Risk / Return Rank: 8
VICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
VICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
VICE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
VICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
VICE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VICE vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VICE	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	0.10	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	0.28	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.03	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	0.08	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	0.14	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VICE vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICE and EATZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VICE	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	0.10	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.10	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.12	+0.11

Drawdowns

VICE vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	VICE	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.27%	-34.40%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.59%	-23.21%	+9.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-23.21%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-33.34%	-1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.14%	-13.56%	+5.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-13.40%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.73%	12.82%	-5.09%

Volatility

VICE vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.53%, while AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VICE	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	4.91%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	13.48%	-4.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.19%	18.81%	-5.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	21.65%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	21.60%	-2.41%

VICE vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VICE vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	0.76%	0.79%	1.46%	1.69%	0.96%	0.99%	0.00%	2.47%	1.72%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VICE and EATZ in my portfolio?

VICE and EATZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VICE or EATZ?

EATZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to VICE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs EATZ's -34.40%.

Which ETF is better, VICE or EATZ?

On 5-year performance, EATZ leads with 2.20% vs -0.32% for VICE. On fees, VICE is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VICE or EATZ?

Over the 5-year period, EATZ has performed better with a 2.20% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VICE or EATZ?

VICE is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VICE or EATZ?

VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between VICE and EATZ?

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 1.00% for EATZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EATZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.