VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L
VHYD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and SDIP.L (Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Dividend funds - VHYD.L tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index while SDIP.L tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VHYD.L returned 18.97%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SDIP.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHYD.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SDIP.L.
Performance
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VHYD.L is traded in USD, while SDIP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SDIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than SDIP.L's 4.94% return.
VHYD.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
SDIP.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 11.63% | 27.03% | 9.32% | 11.43% | -7.88% |
SDIP.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 4.94% | 27.58% | -0.07% | 5.68% | -26.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHYD.L and SDIP.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VHYD.L and SDIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Industrials
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Healthcare
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Technology
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Energy
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Consumer Defensive
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Consumer Cyclical
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Utilities
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Basic Materials
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Communication Services
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Real Estate
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
VHYD.L
SDIP.L
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHYD.L | SDIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.96 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 8.22 | +4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, which is greater than SDIP.L's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and SDIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHYD.L | SDIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.60% | -34.50% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -6.44% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.48% | -19.21% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -6.22% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -18.24% | +12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.32% | -0.16% |
Volatility
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) at 3.03%. This indicates that VHYD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHYD.L | SDIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.03% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 8.34% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 11.14% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 18.09% | -4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 18.09% | -2.82% |
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHYD.L vs. SDIP.L - Dividend Comparison
VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than SDIP.L's 10.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIP.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 10.17% | 9.39% | 11.34% | 12.51% | 8.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.55% | 2.77% | 3.15% | 3.31% | 3.72% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.23% | 3.77% | 2.96% | 3.16% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHYD.L and SDIP.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYD.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYD.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDIP.L.
VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while SDIP.L tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.45% for SDIP.L.
Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and SDIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer