PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYD.L is traded in USD, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than JPLG.L's 10.50% return.


VHYD.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.09%
YTD
11.22%
6M
13.67%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
9.90%

JPLG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
2.52%
YTD
10.50%
6M
12.24%
1Y
21.78%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
11.22%27.03%9.33%11.41%-5.45%17.84%-0.31%6.57%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.50%18.42%10.23%12.69%-10.05%23.54%5.71%6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYD.L and JPLG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.84

The correlation between VHYD.L and JPLG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYD.L
JPLG.L

Financial Services

28.6%
11.3%

Industrials

12.3%
10.5%

Healthcare

11.2%
12.2%

Energy

9.4%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
8.4%

Technology

7.7%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
7.9%

Utilities

5.7%
9.3%

Basic Materials

5.1%
8.1%

Communication Services

3.5%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
7.5%

Financial Services

VHYD.L
28.6%
JPLG.L
11.3%

Industrials

VHYD.L
12.3%
JPLG.L
10.5%

Healthcare

VHYD.L
11.2%
JPLG.L
12.2%

Energy

VHYD.L
9.4%
JPLG.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

VHYD.L
8.7%
JPLG.L
8.4%

Technology

VHYD.L
7.7%
JPLG.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYD.L
7.0%
JPLG.L
7.9%

Utilities

VHYD.L
5.7%
JPLG.L
9.3%

Basic Materials

VHYD.L
5.1%
JPLG.L
8.1%

Communication Services

VHYD.L
3.5%
JPLG.L
5.8%

Real Estate

VHYD.L
0.9%
JPLG.L
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYD.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.28

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

12.30

+0.29

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYD.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYD.LJPLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.37

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.70

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.68

-0.12

Drawdowns

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, roughly equal to the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYD.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-35.38%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-6.61%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-12.54%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-21.57%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-4.51%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.77%

+0.38%

Volatility

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 2.31%. This indicates that VHYD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYD.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.31%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

6.90%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

9.16%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

13.19%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.83%

-0.41%

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYD.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.48%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYD.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYD.L.

VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer