VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L
VHYD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHYD.L is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while FGQD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHYD.L returned 10.91%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for FGQD.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VHYD.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FGQD.L.
Performance
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VHYD.L is traded in USD, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than FGQD.L's 8.45% return.
VHYD.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
FGQD.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 22.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 11.63% | 27.03% | 9.32% | 11.43% | -5.45% | 17.84% | -0.31% | 20.75% | -11.71% | 13.26% |
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 8.45% | 20.61% | 11.33% | 17.39% | -10.91% | 22.66% | 9.68% | 28.80% | -7.79% | -7.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHYD.L and FGQD.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VHYD.L and FGQD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Industrials
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Healthcare
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Technology
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Energy
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Consumer Defensive
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Consumer Cyclical
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Utilities
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Basic Materials
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Communication Services
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Real Estate
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank
VHYD.L
FGQD.L
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHYD.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.36 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.51 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 11.28 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, which is greater than FGQD.L's maximum drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and FGQD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHYD.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.60% | -34.58% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -9.04% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.48% | -15.59% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -22.77% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -1.91% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -5.62% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.01% | +0.15% |
Volatility
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that VHYD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHYD.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.93% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 8.99% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 11.21% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 14.29% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 16.76% | -1.49% |
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHYD.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison
VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than FGQD.L's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 1.80% | 1.86% | 2.31% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 2.44% | 2.70% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.55% | 2.77% | 3.15% | 3.31% | 3.72% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.23% | 3.77% | 2.96% | 3.16% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHYD.L and FGQD.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYD.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYD.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.
VHYD.L is categorized as Dividend, while FGQD.L is Global Equities. VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.40% for FGQD.L.
Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and FGQD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer