PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYA.L is traded in USD, while WQDS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WQDS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYA.L achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 14.82% return.


VHYA.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.82%
YTD
11.07%
6M
13.82%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*

WQDS.L

1D
0.19%
1M
6.77%
YTD
14.82%
6M
16.19%
1Y
31.93%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHYA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
11.07%27.02%9.27%11.29%-5.35%17.77%-0.22%8.38%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
14.83%25.33%10.58%17.51%-6.52%17.65%0.42%8.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYA.L and WQDS.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.80

The correlation between VHYA.L and WQDS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYA.L
WQDS.L

Financial Services

28.6%
16.9%

Industrials

12.3%
11.1%

Healthcare

11.2%
14.4%

Energy

9.4%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
3.6%

Technology

7.7%
35.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
4.3%

Utilities

5.7%
3.1%

Basic Materials

5.1%
0.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
5.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.3%

Financial Services

VHYA.L
28.6%
WQDS.L
16.9%

Industrials

VHYA.L
12.3%
WQDS.L
11.1%

Healthcare

VHYA.L
11.2%
WQDS.L
14.4%

Energy

VHYA.L
9.4%
WQDS.L
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

VHYA.L
8.7%
WQDS.L
3.6%

Technology

VHYA.L
7.7%
WQDS.L
35.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYA.L
7.0%
WQDS.L
4.3%

Utilities

VHYA.L
5.7%
WQDS.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

VHYA.L
5.1%
WQDS.L
0.7%

Communication Services

VHYA.L
3.5%
WQDS.L
5.4%

Real Estate

VHYA.L
0.9%
WQDS.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYA.L
VHYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VHYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYA.LWQDS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.92

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

14.62

-2.11

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYA.L and WQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYA.LWQDS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.69

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.91

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.77

-0.07

Drawdowns

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYA.L drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, which is greater than WQDS.L's maximum drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYA.L and WQDS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYA.LWQDS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.62%

-32.80%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-8.11%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-14.02%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-21.43%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.28%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-4.03%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.18%

0.00%

Volatility

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) is 3.08%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that VHYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYA.LWQDS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.37%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.91%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

11.80%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

13.81%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

14.63%

+1.91%

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYA.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYA.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHYA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.90%3.12%3.24%3.55%3.56%3.71%3.84%3.98%4.19%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYA.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYA.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYA.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

VHYA.L is categorized as Dividend, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. VHYA.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYA.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYA.L and WQDS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer