PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYA.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYA.L achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.66% return.


VHYA.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.82%
YTD
11.07%
6M
13.82%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.66%
6M
12.55%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHYA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
11.07%27.02%9.27%11.29%-5.35%17.77%-0.22%8.38%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.66%40.76%8.81%14.81%9.40%18.51%-2.72%8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYA.L and TDGB.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between VHYA.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYA.L
TDGB.L

Financial Services

28.6%
31.7%

Industrials

12.3%
3.9%

Healthcare

11.2%
14.4%

Energy

9.4%
19.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
10.1%

Technology

7.7%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
3.8%

Utilities

5.7%
6.2%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.7%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.0%

Financial Services

VHYA.L
28.6%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Industrials

VHYA.L
12.3%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Healthcare

VHYA.L
11.2%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Energy

VHYA.L
9.4%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Consumer Defensive

VHYA.L
8.7%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Technology

VHYA.L
7.7%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYA.L
7.0%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Utilities

VHYA.L
5.7%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

VHYA.L
5.1%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Communication Services

VHYA.L
3.5%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Real Estate

VHYA.L
0.9%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYA.L
VHYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VHYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYA.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

5.52

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

15.71

-3.20

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYA.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYA.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.16

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.88

-0.19

Drawdowns

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYA.L drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, roughly equal to the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYA.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYA.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.62%

-37.43%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-5.06%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-13.67%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-18.93%

-2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-1.86%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-4.33%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.78%

+0.40%

Volatility

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that VHYA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYA.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.78%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.06%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

11.05%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

14.21%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.79%

-0.25%

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYA.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYA.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%
VHYA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYA.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYA.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYA.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

VHYA.L is categorized as Dividend, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. VHYA.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYA.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYA.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer