PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF (VHY.AX) and RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHY.AX is traded in AUD, while RCD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RCD.TO values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHY.AX achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than RCD.TO's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VHY.AX has outperformed RCD.TO with an annualized return of 10.62%, while RCD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.


VHY.AX

1D
0.95%
1M
2.00%
YTD
9.84%
6M
11.48%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
10.62%

RCD.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.25%
YTD
3.63%
6M
-2.19%
1Y
9.99%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHY.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF
9.84%14.77%11.78%11.14%8.51%16.65%1.73%20.44%-7.53%9.85%
RCD.TO
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF
3.63%18.31%12.30%12.90%-3.88%36.10%-8.72%28.26%-9.50%4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VHY.AX and RCD.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2014

0.17

The correlation between VHY.AX and RCD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHY.AX
VHY.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VHY.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHY.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHY.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VHY.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHY.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

RCD.TO
RCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF (VHY.AX) and RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHY.AXRCD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

0.86

+3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

1.99

+9.05

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHY.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the RCD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHY.AX and RCD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHY.AXRCD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.78

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.80

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.61

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.51

+0.18

Drawdowns

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHY.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, roughly equal to the maximum RCD.TO drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHY.AX and RCD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHY.AXRCD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-35.79%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-11.72%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-12.78%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.41%

-12.78%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

-35.79%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-5.23%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-5.52%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

5.04%

-3.17%

Volatility

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF (VHY.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) at 2.79%. This indicates that VHY.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHY.AXRCD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.79%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

11.78%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29%

12.97%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

13.12%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

15.12%

-0.81%

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHY.AX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RCD.TO's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHY.AX vs. RCD.TO - Dividend Comparison

VHY.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than RCD.TO's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCD.TO
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF
2.88%3.07%3.17%3.39%3.36%2.34%3.45%3.12%3.64%3.01%3.08%3.62%
VHY.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF
5.39%8.36%5.32%4.85%5.74%4.77%3.55%5.35%9.07%7.49%5.16%8.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHY.AX and RCD.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHY.AX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHY.AX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RCD.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VHY.AX and 0.43% for RCD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHY.AX and RCD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer