PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVG.L is traded in GBP, while VHYD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VHYD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly lower than VHYD.L's 13.25% return.


VHVG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
1.74%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.55%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*

VHYD.L

1D
0.08%
1M
2.19%
YTD
13.25%
6M
13.76%
1Y
29.50%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
12.23%13.84%20.00%17.53%-8.16%22.64%12.56%-17.91%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
13.25%17.98%11.23%5.86%5.79%18.96%-3.24%0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVG.L and VHYD.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.76

The correlation between VHVG.L and VHYD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVG.L
VHYD.L

Technology

29.0%
9.5%

Financial Services

15.6%
28.2%

Industrials

11.5%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.2%

Communication Services

9.0%
3.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
8.5%

Energy

4.1%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
5.2%

Utilities

2.6%
5.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.8%

Technology

VHVG.L
29.0%
VHYD.L
9.5%

Financial Services

VHVG.L
15.6%
VHYD.L
28.2%

Industrials

VHVG.L
11.5%
VHYD.L
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VHVG.L
9.3%
VHYD.L
7.2%

Communication Services

VHVG.L
9.0%
VHYD.L
3.4%

Healthcare

VHVG.L
8.5%
VHYD.L
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

VHVG.L
5.1%
VHYD.L
8.5%

Energy

VHVG.L
4.1%
VHYD.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

VHVG.L
3.4%
VHYD.L
5.2%

Utilities

VHVG.L
2.6%
VHYD.L
5.3%

Real Estate

VHVG.L
2.0%
VHYD.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHVG.LVHYD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.55

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

4.25

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.86

15.70

+1.16

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVG.L and VHYD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than VHYD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and VHYD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVG.LVHYD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-29.43%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-6.91%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-12.99%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

-12.99%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.31%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-3.69%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.87%

-0.14%

Volatility

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) at 3.19%. This indicates that VHVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVG.LVHYD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.19%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

8.40%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

10.23%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

12.28%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

14.72%

+5.82%

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYD.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHVG.L vs. VHYD.L - Dividend Comparison

VHVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.57%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVG.L and VHYD.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYD.L.

VHVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VHYD.L is Dividend. VHVG.L tracks FTSE Developed Index, while VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVG.L and 0.29% for VHYD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and VHYD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer