VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L
VHVE.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XWTS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - VHVE.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed, while XWTS.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHVE.L returned 12.10%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for XWTS.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHVE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XWTS.L.
Performance
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHVE.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than XWTS.L's 3.66% return.
VHVE.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 28.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- —
XWTS.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.59% | 22.18% | 17.93% | 24.66% | -18.06% | 21.15% | 16.52% | 8.50% |
XWTS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 3.66% | 28.97% | 34.65% | 47.43% | -37.76% | 16.03% | 22.50% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHVE.L and XWTS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VHVE.L and XWTS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
Financial Services
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Industrials
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
Communication Services
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
Healthcare
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Energy
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Basic Materials
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Utilities
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
-
Real Estate
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VHVE.L
XWTS.L
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHVE.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.29 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 2.17 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.41 | 8.66 | +5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHVE.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.69 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.57 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.61 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum XWTS.L drawdown of -44.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and XWTS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHVE.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -44.71% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -11.35% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.52% | -18.95% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -44.71% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -3.20% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -8.84% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.85% | -0.87% |
Volatility
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) is 3.64%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that VHVE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XWTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHVE.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 4.13% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 10.57% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 14.57% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 19.07% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 17.97% | -0.46% |
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XWTS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHVE.L vs. XWTS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VHVE.L nor XWTS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VHVE.L and XWTS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWTS.L.
VHVE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XWTS.L is Communications Equities. VHVE.L tracks FTSE Developed, while XWTS.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVE.L and 0.25% for XWTS.L.
Find the right allocation for VHVE.L and XWTS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer