PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWTS.L vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XWTS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
-4.06%28.97%8.09%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
-4.91%22.19%5.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWTS.L achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's -4.91% return.


XWTS.L

1D
2.69%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-4.06%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*

QTOP

1D
1.40%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
-4.91%
6M
-2.53%
1Y
27.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWTS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XWTS.L vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWTS.L
XWTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWTS.LQTOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.17

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

1.78

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.21

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

7.54

+2.38

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWTS.L and QTOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWTS.LQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.17

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.68

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between XWTS.L and QTOP is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

XWTS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


Drawdowns

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWTS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.L and QTOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XWTS.LQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.71%

-23.28%

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-12.88%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

-8.35%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-4.12%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.78%

-1.00%

Volatility

XWTS.L vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) is 5.76%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that XWTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XWTS.LQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

7.24%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

13.92%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

23.53%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

23.11%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

23.11%

-5.20%