VHT vs. RWJ
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while RWJ is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.87%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for RWJ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWJ.
Performance
VHT vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than RWJ's 21.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed RWJ with an annualized return of 9.87%, while RWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
RWJ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 21.05%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 42.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
VHT vs. RWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 21.05% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 16.21% | -10.97% | 52.82% | 20.83% | 20.29% | -16.95% | 5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and RWJ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008 | 0.59 |
The correlation between VHT and RWJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHT vs. RWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
RWJ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
VHT
RWJ
Financial Services
VHT
RWJ
Industrials
VHT
RWJ
Technology
VHT
RWJ
Basic Materials
VHT
-
RWJ
Communication Services
VHT
-
RWJ
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
RWJ
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
RWJ
Energy
VHT
-
RWJ
Real Estate
VHT
-
RWJ
Utilities
VHT
-
RWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. RWJ — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
RWJ
VHT vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | RWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 3.56 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 11.43 | -7.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum RWJ drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and RWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | RWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -55.97% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -11.31% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -29.29% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -29.29% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -51.33% | +22.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | 0.00% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -9.22% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 3.52% | +0.67% |
Volatility
VHT vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) have volatilities of 4.88% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | RWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 4.67% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 12.46% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 19.48% | -4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 23.71% | -8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 26.14% | -9.17% |
VHT vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHT vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than RWJ's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and RWJ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VHT has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to RWJ (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs RWJ's -55.97%.
On 10-year performance, RWJ leads with 13.64% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RWJ has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.97% for RWJ.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RWJ is Small Cap Value Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.39% for RWJ.
RWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and RWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer