PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHT vs. IHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHT vs. IHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than IHF's 4.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has outperformed IHF with an annualized return of 9.26%, while IHF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.


VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%

IHF

1D
0.14%
1M
3.63%
YTD
4.65%
6M
3.57%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
0.41%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. IHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
4.65%0.92%-7.90%-1.11%-7.11%24.46%17.67%22.34%9.56%25.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and IHF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and IHF has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHT vs. IHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHT
IHF

Healthcare

100.0%
99.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.6%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Technology

0.0%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

VHT
100.0%
IHF
99.1%

Financial Services

VHT
0.0%
IHF
0.6%

Industrials

VHT
0.0%
IHF

-

Technology

VHT
0.0%
IHF
0.3%

Basic Materials

VHT

-

IHF

-

Communication Services

VHT

-

IHF

-

Consumer Cyclical

VHT

-

IHF

-

Consumer Defensive

VHT

-

IHF

-

Energy

VHT

-

IHF

-

Real Estate

VHT

-

IHF

-

Utilities

VHT

-

IHF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHT vs. IHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IHF
IHF Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHTIHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.08

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.34

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

0.78

+2.69

VHT vs. IHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the IHF Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and IHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHTIHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.31

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

-0.03

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.38

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.38

+0.18

Drawdowns

VHT vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and IHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHTIHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-58.42%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-19.72%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-29.85%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-29.85%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-35.23%

+6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

-13.16%

+6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-10.65%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

8.51%

-4.37%

Volatility

VHT vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.08%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHTIHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.30%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

15.82%

-5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

21.51%

-7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

19.10%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

21.00%

-4.06%

VHT vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IHF's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHT vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than IHF's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
1.07%1.05%0.86%0.79%0.74%0.56%0.53%0.58%4.01%0.19%0.25%0.20%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHT and IHF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHF has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VHT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs IHF's -58.42%.

On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.26% vs 8.04% for IHF. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IHF.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.07% for IHF.

VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VHT and 0.43% for IHF.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHT and IHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer