VHT vs. BOTZ
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHT returned 4.78%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
VHT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 2.46% return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
VHT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 2.46% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and BOTZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and BOTZ has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VHT vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
BOTZ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
VHT
BOTZ
Financial Services
VHT
BOTZ
Industrials
VHT
BOTZ
Technology
VHT
BOTZ
Basic Materials
VHT
-
BOTZ
Communication Services
VHT
-
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
BOTZ
Energy
VHT
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
VHT
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
VHT
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
BOTZ
VHT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.99 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 3.26 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -55.54% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -19.34% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -29.02% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -55.54% | +37.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -10.83% | +7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -18.29% | +12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 5.84% | -1.65% |
Volatility
VHT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 8.89% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 19.49% | -9.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 25.07% | -10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 26.90% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 25.79% | -8.82% |
VHT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than BOTZ's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.64% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, VHT leads with 4.78% vs 1.51% for BOTZ. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VHT has performed better with a 4.78% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.64% for BOTZ.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.68% for BOTZ.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer