PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VGWD.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGWD.DE achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 17.93% return.


VGWD.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.46%
6M
11.32%
YTD
16.32%
1Y
27.78%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*

XNAS.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.54%
6M
16.10%
YTD
17.93%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VGWD.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
16.32%13.16%15.75%7.29%0.08%22.59%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
17.93%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between VGWD.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.54

The correlation between VGWD.DE and XNAS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGWD.DE
VGWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VGWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VGWD.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGWD.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.30

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

2.91

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

8.31

+10.45

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGWD.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGWD.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGWD.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.57%

-31.25%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-10.00%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-26.72%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-31.25%

+14.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-3.52%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-7.71%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

3.49%

-2.01%

Volatility

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VGWD.DE) is 1.76%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that VGWD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGWD.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

5.65%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

12.50%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

17.15%

-7.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

20.10%

-8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

19.92%

-5.77%

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGWD.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGWD.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGWD.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.48%2.84%3.05%3.40%3.78%3.02%3.08%3.21%3.70%0.58%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGWD.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VGWD.DE.

VGWD.DE is categorized as Dividend, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. VGWD.DE tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VGWD.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGWD.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer