PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGVT vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGVT vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.15% return.


VGVT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.01%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.65%
1Y
1.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.72%

VT

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.20%
6M
7.80%
YTD
11.15%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$256.38K$357.24K$499.27K
$425.08M$369.63M$481.55M

VGVT vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGVT and VT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGVT vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGVT
VGVT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGVT vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGVTVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.29

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

9.54

-7.34

VGVT vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGVT and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGVT vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGVTVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-50.27%

+47.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-9.67%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-1.84%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-6.97%

+6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

2.32%

-1.16%

Volatility

VGVT vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) is 0.99%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that VGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGVTVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

3.99%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

11.68%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28%

13.96%

-10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.27%

16.22%

-12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.27%

17.18%

-13.91%

VGVT vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGVT vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGVT
Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF
4.14%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGVT and VT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to VGVT (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGVT dropped -2.77% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 1-year performance, VT leads with 23.51% vs 1.76% for VGVT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VGVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VT has performed better with a 23.51% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VGVT.

VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

VGVT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while VT is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGVT and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer