VGVT vs. NUAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. VGVT is actively managed, while NUAG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for NUAG.

Performance

VGVT vs. NUAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than NUAG's 0.50% return.

VGVT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUAG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGVT vs. NUAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF	0.11%	3.28%
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.50%	3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VGVT and NUAG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

VGVT vs. NUAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUAG

NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 47
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGVT vs. NUAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VGVT	NUAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	0.31	+0.86

Drawdowns

VGVT vs. NUAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum NUAG drawdown of -19.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and NUAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGVT	NUAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-19.79%	+17.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-1.23%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-4.95%	+4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VGVT	NUAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22%	3.58%	-0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.22%	6.01%	-2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.22%	5.49%	-2.27%

VGVT vs. NUAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NUAG's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VGVT vs. NUAG - Dividend Comparison

VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than NUAG's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.50%	4.43%	4.44%	3.95%	3.60%	2.27%	2.93%	3.54%	3.79%	3.38%	0.48%
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF	3.99%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGVT and NUAG in my portfolio?

VGVT and NUAG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VGVT or NUAG?

On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGVT or NUAG?

VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NUAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VGVT or NUAG?

NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.99% for VGVT.

What is the main difference between VGVT and NUAG?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.19% for NUAG.