VGSR vs. IFGL
VGSR (Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF) and IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. VGSR is actively managed, while IFGL is passively managed. Over the past year, VGSR returned 10.24% vs 6.13% for IFGL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGSR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IFGL.
Performance
VGSR vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGSR achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than IFGL's -2.19% return.
VGSR
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 10.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFGL
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
VGSR vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | 7.94% | 6.31% | 5.59% | 7.01% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.19% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGSR and IFGL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VGSR and IFGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGSR vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank
VGSR
IFGL
VGSR vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGSR | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.43 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 1.32 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGSR | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.45 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.04 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
VGSR vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGSR drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum IFGL drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSR and IFGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGSR | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.33% | -67.94% | +49.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -14.38% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -14.94% | +12.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -16.68% | +12.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 4.65% | -1.72% |
Volatility
VGSR vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) is 3.81%, while iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that VGSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGSR | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 4.54% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 11.46% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 13.68% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 16.38% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 16.59% | -1.49% |
VGSR vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGSR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGSR vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison
VGSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than IFGL's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.90% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | 3.47% | 3.41% | 3.79% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGSR and IFGL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFGL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to VGSR (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSR dropped -18.33% vs IFGL's -67.94%.
On 1-year performance, VGSR leads with 10.24% vs 6.13% for IFGL. On fees, VGSR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, VGSR has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGSR has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGSR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IFGL.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.47% for VGSR.
They also come from different issuers: Vert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for VGSR and 0.48% for IFGL.
VGSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGSR and IFGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer