PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGSAX vs. NAINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A (VGSAX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGSAX achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than NAINX's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VGSAX has underperformed NAINX with an annualized return of 5.50%, while NAINX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


VGSAX

1D
0.44%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.68%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
5.50%

NAINX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.91%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.38%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGSAX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A
8.01%9.19%3.36%9.89%-27.03%31.24%-1.21%29.47%-4.94%12.77%
NAINX
Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund
1.80%6.83%14.00%22.38%-28.48%6.63%31.47%28.49%-7.19%19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VGSAX and NAINX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2009

0.64

The correlation between VGSAX and NAINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGSAX vs. NAINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGSAX
VGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NAINX
NAINX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
NAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A (VGSAX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGSAXNAINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

0.33

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

1.10

+2.67

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the NAINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGSAX and NAINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGSAXNAINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.39

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.22

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.62

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.60

-0.02

Drawdowns

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGSAX drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, which is greater than NAINX's maximum drawdown of -36.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSAX and NAINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGSAXNAINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.63%

-36.50%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-10.19%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-11.79%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.81%

-36.50%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

-36.50%

-5.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-0.49%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-5.27%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.08%

-0.32%

Volatility

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A (VGSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) at 2.67%. This indicates that VGSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGSAXNAINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.67%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

7.00%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

8.79%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

13.69%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

13.30%

+4.46%

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGSAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than NAINX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGSAX vs. NAINX - Dividend Comparison

VGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than NAINX's 15.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAINX
Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund
15.81%15.87%13.38%1.94%7.34%7.54%2.06%2.24%4.41%2.61%10.78%7.34%
VGSAX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A
2.12%2.29%2.22%1.72%0.62%2.72%0.00%6.12%1.60%2.04%2.39%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGSAX and NAINX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGSAX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to NAINX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSAX dropped -41.63% vs NAINX's -36.50%.

VGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGSAX and NAINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer