VGRO vs. KMID

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

VGRO (Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while KMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VGRO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.

Performance

VGRO vs. KMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGRO achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than KMID's 3.22% return.

VGRO

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -4.62%
• 6M: -2.34%
• YTD: -3.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

KMID

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 1.41%
• 6M: -0.79%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 1Y: -0.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	$204.33K	$229.56K	$283.57K
VGRO Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF	$13.12K	$11.58K	$24.68K

VGRO vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VGRO Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF	-3.29%	-0.88%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	3.22%	-1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VGRO and KMID is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.45

VGRO vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VGRO	KMID
Technology	48.7%	18.5%
Communication Services	20.1%	-
Industrials	9.5%	44.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	4.8%
Healthcare	7.3%	14.2%
Utilities	4.7%	-
Financial Services	4.2%	9.9%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

VGRO vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGRO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 10
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 10
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGRO vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGRO	KMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.05	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.01	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.16	—

Drawdowns

VGRO vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGRO drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum KMID drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGRO and KMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGRO	KMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-18.89%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.63%	-4.02%	-6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.79%	-5.64%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VGRO	KMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	14.99%	+4.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	16.76%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.46%	16.76%	+2.70%

VGRO vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGRO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGRO vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison

VGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.11%	0.06%	0.05%
VGRO Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGRO and KMID in my portfolio?

VGRO and KMID have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VGRO or KMID?

On fees, VGRO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGRO or KMID?

VGRO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VGRO or KMID?

KMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for VGRO.

What is the main difference between VGRO and KMID?

VGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while KMID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VGRO and 0.80% for KMID.