VGPMX vs. CAEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX).
VGPMX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 23, 1984. CAEIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 4.53% | 65.96% | 5.78% | 10.06% | 7.34% | 19.50% | 17.21% | 20.67% | -32.26% | 13.75% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 4.22% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 29.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGPMX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly higher than CAEIX's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, VGPMX has outperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 12.39%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
VGPMX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -10.69%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 17.55%
- 1Y
- 57.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.25%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
CAEIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 41.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGPMX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VGPMX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank
VGPMX
CAEIX
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGPMX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | 2.20 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 2.90 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.39 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.59 | 14.41 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGPMX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.20 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.18 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.51 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.03 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between VGPMX and CAEIX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison
VGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than CAEIX's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 3.73% | 2.59% | 2.68% | 3.22% | 3.27% | 3.26% | 2.03% | 2.39% | 3.02% | 0.02% | 1.72% | 2.32% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.69% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGPMX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, roughly equal to the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGPMX and CAEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGPMX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.85% | -75.81% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -11.07% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.71% | -32.58% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.59% | -37.54% | -17.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.73% | -13.12% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.69% | -49.06% | +14.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.62% | +0.47% |
Volatility
VGPMX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) at 6.88%. This indicates that VGPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VGPMX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 6.88% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 12.14% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 18.28% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 19.08% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.61% | +2.04% |