PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGMS vs. OOSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGMS vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGMS achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 3.12% return.


VGMS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.93%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.67%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOSP

1D
0.44%
1M
0.80%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.27%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGMS vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGMS and OOSP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGMS vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGMS
VGMS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGMS vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGMSOOSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

5.13

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.76

19.00

-7.24

VGMS vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGMS and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGMS vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGMS drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGMS and OOSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGMSOOSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.31%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-1.31%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.20%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.35%

+0.19%

Volatility

VGMS vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 0.57%. This indicates that VGMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGMSOOSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.57%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

2.20%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

3.67%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

3.33%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

3.33%

-0.09%

VGMS vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGMS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGMS vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

VGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than OOSP's 6.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.43%6.71%5.42%
VGMS
Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF
5.13%2.94%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGMS and OOSP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGMS has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to OOSP (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGMS dropped -2.46% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.71% vs 6.37% for VGMS. On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.71% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 5.13% for VGMS.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGMS and 0.90% for OOSP.

VGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGMS and OOSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer