VGLT vs. RSST

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) and RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. VGLT is passively managed, while RSST is actively managed. Over the past year, VGLT returned 4.15% vs 47.84% for RSST. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGLT charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSST.

Performance

VGLT vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than RSST's 15.10% return.

VGLT

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 4.15%
• 3Y*: -0.94%
• 5Y*: -5.66%
• 10Y*: -1.28%

RSST

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 6M: 18.35%
• 1Y: 47.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF	-1.16%	5.35%	-6.28%	6.72%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	15.10%	19.91%	18.37%	1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and RSST is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023	0.04

The correlation between VGLT and RSST shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VGLT vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT

VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 17
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 72
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VGLT	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	2.08	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.48	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.36	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	4.11	-3.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	14.27	-12.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VGLT vs. RSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the RSST Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and RSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VGLT	RSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	2.08	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.83	-0.65

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, which is greater than RSST's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGLT	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.18%	-30.80%	-15.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-11.71%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.30%	-6.13%	-31.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.08%	-6.02%	-9.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	3.36%	-0.64%

Volatility

VGLT vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.50%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGLT	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	8.19%	-5.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.96%	16.86%	-10.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.71%	23.18%	-14.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.57%	24.45%	-9.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	24.45%	-10.63%

VGLT vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGLT vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than RSST's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.98%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF	4.64%	4.44%	4.33%	3.33%	2.84%	1.82%	2.15%	2.46%	2.71%	2.55%	2.69%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGLT and RSST in my portfolio?

VGLT and RSST have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VGLT or RSST?

RSST has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs RSST's -30.80%.

Which ETF is better, VGLT or RSST?

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 47.84% vs 4.15% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VGLT or RSST?

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 47.84% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGLT or RSST?

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VGLT or RSST?

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.98% for RSST.

What is the main difference between VGLT and RSST?

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while RSST is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 1.04% for RSST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.