VGIT vs. FBND
VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGIT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. VGIT is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGIT returned 1.16%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FBND. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGIT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
VGIT vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VGIT has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.16%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.
VGIT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.16%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
VGIT vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.78% | 7.34% | 1.39% | 4.28% | -10.53% | -2.64% | 7.71% | 6.19% | 1.35% | 1.70% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGIT and FBND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VGIT and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGIT vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
VGIT
FBND
VGIT vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGIT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 2.01 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 5.97 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGIT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.41 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.12 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.41 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.44 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
VGIT vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGIT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -17.25% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.66% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.34% | -5.94% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -17.25% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.05% | -17.25% | +1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -1.82% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.35% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.90% | +0.07% |
Volatility
VGIT vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is 1.05%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that VGIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGIT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 1.23% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 2.75% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 3.80% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 5.92% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 6.10% | -1.60% |
VGIT vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGIT vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VGIT and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBND has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to VGIT (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGIT dropped -16.05% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 10-year performance, FBND leads with 2.47% vs 1.16% for VGIT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FBND has performed better with a 2.47% return vs 1.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.88% for VGIT.
VGIT is categorized as Government Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGIT and 0.36% for FBND.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGIT and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer