VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and FCUV.TO (Fidelity U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FCUV.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VGG.TO returned 13.16%/yr vs 21.89%/yr for FCUV.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGG.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCUV.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than FCUV.TO's 15.14% return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
FCUV.TO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 15.14%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 34.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.57%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- —
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 8.57% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 11.94% |
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | 15.14% | 14.80% | 35.81% | 19.98% | 2.58% | 38.55% | 10.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and FCUV.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020 | 0.69 |
The correlation between VGG.TO and FCUV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Financial Services
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Healthcare
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Industrials
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Consumer Defensive
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Energy
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
-
Basic Materials
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Utilities
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Communication Services
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
Real Estate
VGG.TO
-
FCUV.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
FCUV.TO
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGG.TO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 5.18 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 18.28 | -7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGG.TO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.46 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 1.45 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.55 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, which is greater than FCUV.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and FCUV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -16.47% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -6.70% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -16.47% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -16.47% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.17% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -2.52% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) is 2.59%, while Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that VGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 5.31% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 10.95% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 14.13% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 15.14% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.72% | +0.25% |
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUV.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than FCUV.TO's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | 0.91% | 1.13% | 1.03% | 1.42% | 2.71% | 1.40% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and FCUV.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCUV.TO.
VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FCUV.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FCUV.TO tracks Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.38% for FCUV.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and FCUV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer