FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO).
FCUV.TO and RUD.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCUV.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020. RUD.TO is an actively managed fund by RBC. It was launched on Jan 9, 2014.
Performance
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | 1.19% | 14.80% | 35.81% | 19.98% | 2.58% | 38.55% | 10.80% |
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | -0.58% | 7.31% | 22.78% | 19.01% | -7.35% | 31.62% | 8.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUV.TO achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than RUD.TO's -0.58% return.
FCUV.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 5.84%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 19.38%
- 10Y*
- —
RUD.TO
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUV.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RUD.TO's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCUV.TO
RUD.TO
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCUV.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.63 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 0.98 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.01 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | 4.08 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCUV.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.63 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.30 | 0.78 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.77 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUV.TO and RUD.TO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than RUD.TO's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.03% | 1.42% | 2.71% | 1.40% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.93% | 2.01% | 1.78% | 1.73% | 2.12% |
Drawdowns
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum RUD.TO drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUV.TO and RUD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUV.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -29.89% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -12.79% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.47% | -28.33% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -8.63% | +4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -3.99% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.17% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FCUV.TO vs. RUD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCUV.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 4.83% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 10.12% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.10% | 18.61% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 15.39% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 15.55% | -0.83% |