VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) are both Dividend funds. VGG.TO is passively managed, while CLSA.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, VGG.TO returned 20.71% vs 88.08% for CLSA.TO. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VGG.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CLSA.TO.

Performance

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than CLSA.TO's 40.42% return.

VGG.TO

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.33%
• 6M: 9.17%
• YTD: 11.79%
• 1Y: 20.71%
• 3Y*: 16.46%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 13.23%
• ALL TIME*: 14.25%

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 3.42%
• 6M: 37.13%
• YTD: 40.42%
• 1Y: 88.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 78.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	CA$729.28K	CA$519.46K	CA$344.99K
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF	CA$900.74K	CA$1.26M	CA$1.26M

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF	11.79%	9.84%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	40.42%	57.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VGG.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGG.TO

VGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
VGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
VGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGG.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	5.64	-3.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	6.31	-3.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	2.07	-0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	7.90	-5.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.04	34.28	-24.24

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGG.TO and CLSA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and CLSA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGG.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.58%	-11.73%	-12.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.07%	-10.78%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-1.67%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-1.25%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.48%	-0.56%

Volatility

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) is 3.13%, while Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that VGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGG.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	5.66%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.77%	13.42%	-5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	15.12%	-4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.70%	16.47%	-3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.97%	16.47%	-1.50%

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGG.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSA.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGG.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CLSA.TO's 10.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	10.55%	7.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF	1.03%	1.16%	1.23%	1.37%	1.35%	1.21%	1.25%	1.24%	1.50%	1.45%	1.63%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGG.TO and CLSA.TO in my portfolio?

VGG.TO and CLSA.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VGG.TO or CLSA.TO?

On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGG.TO or CLSA.TO?

VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CLSA.TO.

What is the main difference between VGG.TO and CLSA.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VGG.TO and 0.60% for CLSA.TO.