PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFVA vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFVA vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.


VFVA

1D
-1.33%
1M
0.94%
YTD
9.50%
6M
10.40%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
-0.97%
1M
1.21%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.23%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFVA vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
9.50%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%9.41%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
17.96%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and AVUV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.96

The correlation between VFVA and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFVA vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFVA
AVUV

Financial Services

25.7%
25.8%

Healthcare

14.9%
4.2%

Technology

14.5%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
18.0%

Industrials

7.6%
13.9%

Energy

7.3%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.3%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.7%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

VFVA
25.7%
AVUV
25.8%

Healthcare

VFVA
14.9%
AVUV
4.2%

Technology

VFVA
14.5%
AVUV
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VFVA
13.1%
AVUV
18.0%

Industrials

VFVA
7.6%
AVUV
13.9%

Energy

VFVA
7.3%
AVUV
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

VFVA
7.1%
AVUV
4.5%

Communication Services

VFVA
6.2%
AVUV
2.8%

Basic Materials

VFVA
3.3%
AVUV
4.9%

Real Estate

VFVA
0.4%
AVUV
0.7%

Utilities

VFVA

-

AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFVA vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFVAAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

2.10

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

3.02

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

4.61

-1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

13.69

-3.08

VFVA vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFVAAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.10

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.56

-0.13

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFVAAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-49.42%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-7.95%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.07%

-28.79%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-28.79%

+4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.12%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-7.95%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.67%

+0.02%

Volatility

VFVA vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) is 3.36%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that VFVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFVAAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

4.08%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

11.34%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

17.54%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

22.74%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

28.30%

-3.98%

VFVA vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFVA vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.95%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VFVA and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VFVA (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs 9.48% for VFVA. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.

VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFVA and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer