PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFQY vs. VNMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFQY vs. VNMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VFQY

1D
1.05%
1M
2.21%
6M
10.27%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.62%

VNMC

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$948.51K$988.82K$1.06M

VFQY vs. VNMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VFQY
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF
14.20%10.24%12.93%22.48%-15.74%27.96%18.92%
VNMC
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%10.34%16.92%-10.74%21.59%19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VFQY and VNMC is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.73

The correlation between VFQY and VNMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFQY vs. VNMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFQY
VFQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFQY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VFQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VNMC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFQY vs. VNMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFQYVNMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

VFQY vs. VNMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFQY vs. VNMC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFQYVNMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

Volatility

VFQY vs. VNMC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFQYVNMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

VFQY vs. VNMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than VNMC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFQY vs. VNMC - Dividend Comparison

VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while VNMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFQY
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.03%1.17%1.34%1.38%1.43%0.98%1.22%1.34%1.31%
VNMC
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.49%1.08%4.30%10.12%0.20%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFQY and VNMC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.

VFQY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for VNMC.

VFQY is categorized as Quality Factor, while VNMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.85% for VNMC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFQY and VNMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer