VFQY vs. RSHO
VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VFQY returned 16.09%/yr vs 30.96%/yr for RSHO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFQY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.
Performance
VFQY vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 39.40% return.
VFQY
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
RSHO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 39.40%
- 6M
- 36.53%
- 1Y
- 62.97%
- 3Y*
- 30.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFQY vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 8.55% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 21.15% |
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 39.40% | 19.23% | 17.28% | 28.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFQY and RSHO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VFQY and RSHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFQY vs. RSHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFQY
RSHO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VFQY
RSHO
Financial Services
VFQY
RSHO
Industrials
VFQY
RSHO
Consumer Cyclical
VFQY
RSHO
Consumer Defensive
VFQY
RSHO
-
Healthcare
VFQY
RSHO
-
Communication Services
VFQY
RSHO
-
Basic Materials
VFQY
RSHO
Energy
VFQY
RSHO
Real Estate
VFQY
-
RSHO
-
Utilities
VFQY
-
RSHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFQY vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank
VFQY
RSHO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFQY vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFQY | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.45 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 16.97 | -8.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFQY vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than RSHO's maximum drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and RSHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFQY | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -27.31% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -14.64% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -27.31% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | 0.00% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -4.27% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.83% | -1.38% |
Volatility
VFQY vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is 3.79%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that VFQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFQY | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 9.26% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 20.99% | -11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 24.93% | -11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 22.82% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 22.82% | -1.98% |
VFQY vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFQY vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison
VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while RSHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.21% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 0.82% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFQY and RSHO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSHO has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to VFQY (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs RSHO's -27.31%.
On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 30.96% vs 16.09% for VFQY. On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 30.96% return vs 16.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.
VFQY has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.21% for RSHO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.75% for RSHO.
RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFQY and RSHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer