VFQY vs. EPU
VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. VFQY is actively managed, while EPU is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFQY returned 9.20%/yr vs 29.94%/yr for EPU. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFQY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.
Performance
VFQY vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 19.72% return.
VFQY
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
EPU
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 78.12%
- 3Y*
- 43.35%
- 5Y*
- 29.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
VFQY vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 12.19% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 16.97% | 25.75% | -8.19% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 19.72% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFQY and EPU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.48 |
VFQY vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFQY
EPU
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VFQY
EPU
-
Financial Services
VFQY
EPU
Industrials
VFQY
EPU
Consumer Cyclical
VFQY
EPU
Consumer Defensive
VFQY
EPU
Healthcare
VFQY
EPU
Communication Services
VFQY
EPU
Basic Materials
VFQY
EPU
Energy
VFQY
EPU
-
Real Estate
VFQY
-
EPU
Utilities
VFQY
-
EPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFQY vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
VFQY
EPU
VFQY vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFQY | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.77 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 10.39 | -2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFQY vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFQY | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -60.62% | +23.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -20.85% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -20.85% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -35.59% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -7.70% | +7.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -18.76% | +12.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 7.54% | -5.10% |
Volatility
VFQY vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is 3.51%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that VFQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFQY | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 9.54% | -6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 27.25% | -17.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 31.60% | -18.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 25.20% | -6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 23.65% | -2.87% |
VFQY vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFQY vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than EPU's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 2.00% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.05% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFQY and EPU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to VFQY (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 5-year performance, EPU leads with 29.94% vs 9.20% for VFQY. On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EPU has performed better with a 29.94% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.05% for VFQY.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.59% for EPU.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFQY and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer