VFMV vs. YAFFX
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and YAFFX (AMG Yacktman Focused Fund) are both funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while YAFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.55%/yr vs 9.34%/yr for YAFFX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for YAFFX.
Performance
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 25.77% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
YAFFX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 25.77%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 20.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.57% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -0.34% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 25.77% | 3.89% | 9.30% | 16.53% | -8.20% | 16.48% | 17.22% | 19.21% | 3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and YAFFX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VFMV and YAFFX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
YAFFX
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFMV | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.26 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 4.47 | +3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and YAFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -43.80% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -17.08% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | -18.88% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -21.31% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -4.28% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -6.21% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 4.77% | -3.22% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.30%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 7.30% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.32% | 22.77% | -16.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 22.71% | -13.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 18.22% | -6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 16.59% | -2.36% |
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMV vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.44% | 4.42% | 7.60% | 4.70% | 11.87% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 11.82% | 11.81% | 24.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YAFFX has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to VFMV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and YAFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer