PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. VVOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly lower than VVOAX's 16.45% return.


VFMV

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.40%
6M
6.67%
YTD
9.62%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.94%

VVOAX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-4.95%
6M
10.23%
YTD
16.45%
1Y
35.16%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.81%
ALL TIME*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
9.62%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-0.34%
VVOAX
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund
16.45%20.24%30.01%15.20%1.33%35.60%5.49%29.84%-22.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and VVOAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.67

The correlation between VFMV and VVOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMV vs. VVOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VVOAX
VVOAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VVOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VVOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFMVVVOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.83

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

12.20

-3.53

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the VVOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and VVOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum VVOAX drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and VVOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMVVVOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-62.08%

+28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-9.21%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-24.05%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-24.05%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-6.80%

+6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-11.68%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.88%

-1.32%

Volatility

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 1.91%, while Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMVVVOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

6.09%

-4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.44%

15.68%

-9.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

19.65%

-10.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

21.33%

-9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

24.09%

-9.91%

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than VVOAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFMV vs. VVOAX - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than VVOAX's 8.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.77%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VVOAX
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund
8.96%10.43%7.79%2.27%9.79%8.82%0.25%1.95%15.44%5.11%1.10%15.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMV and VVOAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVOAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to VFMV (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs VVOAX's -62.08%.

VVOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMV and VVOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer