PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 13.16% return.


VFMV

1D
0.21%
1M
0.96%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.41%
1Y
13.49%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

VTV

1D
0.77%
1M
4.08%
YTD
13.16%
6M
14.00%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.76%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-1.10%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
13.16%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and VTV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.83

The correlation between VFMV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMV
VTV

Technology

25.1%
13.4%

Communication Services

10.7%
3.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
22.3%

Industrials

10.1%
14.0%

Healthcare

10.1%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
4.0%

Utilities

6.7%
5.2%

Real Estate

6.4%
2.8%

Energy

3.9%
8.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Technology

VFMV
25.1%
VTV
13.4%

Communication Services

VFMV
10.7%
VTV
3.3%

Financial Services

VFMV
10.6%
VTV
22.3%

Industrials

VFMV
10.1%
VTV
14.0%

Healthcare

VFMV
10.1%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFMV
9.5%
VTV
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMV
6.9%
VTV
4.0%

Utilities

VFMV
6.7%
VTV
5.2%

Real Estate

VFMV
6.4%
VTV
2.8%

Energy

VFMV
3.9%
VTV
8.1%

Basic Materials

VFMV

-

VTV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMVVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.50

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

4.41

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

16.67

-7.81

VFMV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMVVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.77

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.83

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.51

+0.18

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMVVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-59.27%

+25.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-6.35%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-14.52%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-17.04%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

0.00%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-7.87%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.68%

-0.15%

Volatility

VFMV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.04%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMVVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

2.48%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

7.57%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

10.12%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

13.88%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

16.66%

-2.41%

VFMV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VTV's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.85%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMV and VTV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTV has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.41% vs 9.87% for VFMV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.

VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMV and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer