VFMO vs. META

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) is Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, VFMO returned 14.45%/yr vs 12.58%/yr for META. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

VFMO vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 26.55% return, which is significantly higher than META's -9.93% return.

VFMO

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 6.71%
• YTD: 26.55%
• 6M: 26.16%
• 1Y: 48.27%
• 3Y*: 27.53%
• 5Y*: 14.45%
• 10Y*: —

META

• 1D: 4.77%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -9.93%
• 6M: -8.18%
• 1Y: -12.74%
• 3Y*: 28.68%
• 5Y*: 12.58%
• 10Y*: 18.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMO vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	26.55%	17.39%	26.14%	16.25%	-12.84%	19.16%	31.36%	28.22%	-11.41%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-9.93%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMO and META is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.53

The correlation between VFMO and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VFMO vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMO

VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 78
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 27
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
META Omega Ratio Rank: 25
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
META Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMO vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFMO	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-0.36	+2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	-0.29	+3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.96	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	-0.38	+4.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.46	-0.79	+17.25

VFMO vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMO and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFMO vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFMO	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.77%	-76.74%	+39.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-33.30%	+22.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.40%	-34.15%	+9.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.80%	-76.74%	+50.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-24.63%	+24.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-15.83%	+8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	16.13%	-13.19%

Volatility

VFMO vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) is 8.34%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that VFMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFMO	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.34%	11.35%	-3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	27.33%	-9.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.14%	35.89%	-13.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.89%	44.10%	-22.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.63%	38.72%	-15.09%

Dividends

VFMO vs. META - Dividend Comparison

VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than META's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.44%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.61%	0.82%	0.72%	0.89%	1.72%	0.81%	0.45%	1.22%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFMO and META in my portfolio?

VFMO and META have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFMO or META?

META has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to VFMO (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.