VFMO vs. DFEV
VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard, while DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VFMO returned 26.27%/yr vs 22.74%/yr for DFEV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DFEV.
Performance
VFMO vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 20.45% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 22.81% return.
VFMO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 37.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- —
DFEV
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 22.81%
- 6M
- 25.32%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 20.45% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -1.43% |
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 22.81% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMO and DFEV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VFMO and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFMO vs. DFEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMO
DFEV
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
VFMO
DFEV
Healthcare
VFMO
DFEV
Technology
VFMO
DFEV
Consumer Cyclical
VFMO
DFEV
Energy
VFMO
DFEV
Financial Services
VFMO
DFEV
Basic Materials
VFMO
DFEV
Communication Services
VFMO
DFEV
Consumer Defensive
VFMO
DFEV
Utilities
VFMO
DFEV
Real Estate
VFMO
DFEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMO vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank
VFMO
DFEV
VFMO vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 4.09 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 15.04 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.52 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.00 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
VFMO vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and DFEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -18.49% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -11.35% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -17.94% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -6.42% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -4.65% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.08% | -0.16% |
Volatility
VFMO vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) is 7.20%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that VFMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 9.67% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 16.20% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.75% | 18.42% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 16.68% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 16.68% | +6.93% |
VFMO vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMO vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison
VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than DFEV's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.64% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMO and DFEV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEV has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to VFMO (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs DFEV's -18.49%.
On 3-year performance, VFMO leads with 26.27% vs 22.74% for DFEV. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 22.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.
DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.64% for VFMO.
VFMO is categorized as Momentum, while DFEV is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.43% for DFEV.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMO and DFEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer