VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

VFEA.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and EMXC.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Ex China UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - VFEA.L tracks the FTSE Emerging Index while EMXC.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Net Return USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFEA.L returned 5.58%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for EMXC.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFEA.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMXC.L.

Performance

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VFEA.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Ex China UCITS ETF Acc (EMXC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VFEA.L is traded in USD, while EMXC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMXC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFEA.L achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.L's 23.52% return.

VFEA.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 2.80%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 1Y: 16.96%
• 3Y*: 14.95%
• 5Y*: 5.58%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.17%

EMXC.L

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -7.15%
• 6M: 13.58%
• YTD: 23.52%
• 1Y: 42.83%
• 3Y*: 24.12%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMXC.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Ex China UCITS ETF Acc	$7.37M	$5.11M	$7.70M
VFEA.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	$1.71M	$1.76M	$2.44M

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VFEA.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	7.87%	25.75%	12.39%	7.29%	-17.29%	-1.19%	46.13%
EMXC.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Ex China UCITS ETF Acc	23.52%	53.41%	-3.23%	22.38%	-23.72%	1.12%	72.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEA.L and EMXC.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020	0.82

The correlation between VFEA.L and EMXC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEA.L

VFEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
VFEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
VFEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
VFEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
VFEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
VFEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

EMXC.L

EMXC.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EMXC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EMXC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EMXC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMXC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VFEA.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Ex China UCITS ETF Acc (EMXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFEA.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.56	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.10	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.28	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.56	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.07	7.99	-2.93

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEA.L and EMXC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEA.L drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, smaller than the maximum EMXC.L drawdown of -42.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEA.L and EMXC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFEA.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-42.21%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.63%	-16.67%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.18%	-21.96%	+5.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.33%	-41.31%	+9.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	-13.28%	+8.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-12.61%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	5.32%	-1.98%

Volatility

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VFEA.L) is 5.04%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Ex China UCITS ETF Acc (EMXC.L) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that VFEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFEA.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	9.22%	-4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	25.08%	-10.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.30%	27.33%	-10.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.83%	22.46%	-4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.71%	22.24%	-2.53%

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFEA.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFEA.L vs. EMXC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VFEA.L nor EMXC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFEA.L and EMXC.L in my portfolio?

VFEA.L and EMXC.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VFEA.L or EMXC.L?

On fees, EMXC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFEA.L or EMXC.L?

EMXC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VFEA.L.

What is the main difference between VFEA.L and EMXC.L?

VFEA.L tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EMXC.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Net Return USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VFEA.L and 0.15% for EMXC.L.