PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFC vs. UVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VFC vs. UVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Universal Corporation (UVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFC achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than UVV's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VFC has underperformed UVV with an annualized return of -9.33%, while UVV has yielded a comparatively higher 5.09% annualized return.


VFC

1D
0.18%
1M
-12.43%
YTD
-7.59%
6M
-6.88%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
-2.29%
5Y*
-24.29%
10Y*
-9.33%

UVV

1D
-1.88%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.14%
6M
4.14%
1Y
-7.53%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFC vs. UVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFC
V.F. Corporation
-7.59%-13.83%16.64%-28.51%-60.38%-12.05%-12.00%51.70%-1.33%42.78%
UVV
Universal Corporation
3.14%2.27%-13.39%35.79%1.82%19.59%-8.96%11.08%7.79%-14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VFC and UVV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 1988

0.25

The correlation between VFC and UVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

VFC:

$0.57

UVV:

$1.73

PE Ratio

VFC:

29.29

UVV:

30.51

PS Ratio

VFC:

0.68

UVV:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

VFC:

$9.58B

UVV:

$2.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VFC:

$5.16B

UVV:

$412.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

VFC:

$961.05M

UVV:

$212.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFC vs. UVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFC
VFC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

UVV
UVV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFC vs. UVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Universal Corporation (UVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFCUVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.96

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

-0.50

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

-0.83

+3.90

VFC vs. UVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the UVV Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFC and UVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFCUVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

-0.32

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.19

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

0.18

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.28

-0.05

Drawdowns

VFC vs. UVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFC drawdown since its inception was -88.41%, which is greater than UVV's maximum drawdown of -69.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFC and UVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFCUVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.41%

-69.75%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.57%

-15.23%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.66%

-29.70%

-33.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.78%

-29.70%

-57.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.41%

-45.68%

-42.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.75%

-14.30%

-65.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-18.59%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.05%

9.04%

+2.01%

Volatility

VFC vs. UVV - Volatility Comparison

V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to Universal Corporation (UVV) at 10.11%. This indicates that VFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFCUVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.48%

10.11%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.81%

18.46%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.84%

23.77%

+25.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.49%

24.57%

+28.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.90%

28.94%

+15.96%

Dividends

VFC vs. UVV - Dividend Comparison

VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than UVV's 6.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UVV
Universal Corporation
6.22%6.18%5.87%4.72%5.95%5.64%6.30%5.29%4.80%4.11%3.33%3.71%
VFC
V.F. Corporation
2.17%1.99%1.68%5.27%7.28%2.69%2.26%1.91%2.65%2.32%2.87%2.14%

Financials

VFC vs. UVV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between V.F. Corporation and Universal Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
2.88B
0
(VFC) Total Revenue
(UVV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VFC and UVV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFC has higher volatility (11.48%) compared to UVV (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFC dropped -88.41% vs UVV's -69.75%.

VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFC and UVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer