VEXC vs. EMGF
VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and EMGF (iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index while EMGF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEXC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EMGF.
Performance
VEXC vs. EMGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEXC achieves a 20.67% return, which is significantly lower than EMGF's 25.77% return.
VEXC
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 21.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMGF
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 25.77%
- 6M
- 26.91%
- 1Y
- 46.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
VEXC vs. EMGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.67% | 4.50% |
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 25.77% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEXC and EMGF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEXC vs. EMGF — Risk / Return Rank
VEXC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMGF
VEXC vs. EMGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEXC | EMGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEXC vs. EMGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEXC drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum EMGF drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEXC and EMGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEXC | EMGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.42% | -40.23% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -5.41% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -10.02% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility
VEXC vs. EMGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEXC | EMGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 22.67% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 18.34% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 19.67% | +0.60% |
VEXC vs. EMGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEXC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEXC vs. EMGF - Dividend Comparison
VEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than EMGF's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.00% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 5.94% | 4.04% | 2.48% | 1.95% | 2.63% | 2.73% | 1.94% | 2.04% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.43% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VEXC and EMGF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.
EMGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.43% for VEXC.
VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index, while EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VEXC and 0.45% for EMGF.
Find the right allocation for VEXC and EMGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer