PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VERS vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VERS vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VERS having a 36.54% return and XLK slightly lower at 36.47%.


VERS

1D
-0.99%
1M
23.22%
YTD
36.54%
6M
36.31%
1Y
68.21%
3Y*
31.89%
5Y*
10Y*

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VERS vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
36.54%26.16%16.92%51.13%-34.52%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-17.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and XLK is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.84

The correlation between VERS and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VERS vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VERS
XLK

Technology

73.2%
99.7%

Communication Services

18.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

VERS
73.2%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

VERS
18.4%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

VERS
6.6%
XLK

-

Real Estate

VERS
1.8%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

VERS

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

VERS

-

XLK

-

Energy

VERS

-

XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

VERS

-

XLK

-

Healthcare

VERS

-

XLK

-

Industrials

VERS

-

XLK
0.1%

Utilities

VERS

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VERS vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERS
VERS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERS vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VERSXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.52

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.22

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

14.16

-5.52

VERS vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERS Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERS and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VERSXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

3.24

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.42

+0.16

Drawdowns

VERS vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VERSXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.13%

-82.05%

+39.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.02%

-15.92%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-25.66%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.00%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-34.96%

+19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

4.74%

+3.18%

Volatility

VERS vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that VERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VERSXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

6.98%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

16.68%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.54%

20.82%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.26%

24.90%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.26%

24.49%

+6.77%

VERS vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VERS vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
0.24%0.52%0.58%0.63%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


VERS and XLK have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VERS has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 3-year performance, XLK leads with 33.90% vs 31.89% for VERS. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XLK has performed better with a 33.90% return vs 31.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VERS.

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.24% for VERS.

VERS tracks Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VERS and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer