VERS vs. TRUT
VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. VERS is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
VERS vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 36.54% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
VERS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 36.54%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 68.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VERS vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 36.54% | 14.45% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VERS and TRUT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VERS vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
VERS
TRUT
VERS vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VERS | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VERS | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 2.39 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
VERS vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VERS | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -18.55% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -1.46% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -5.17% | -9.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | — | — |
Volatility
VERS vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VERS | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.54% | 21.53% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 21.53% | +9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 21.53% | +9.73% |
VERS vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
VERS vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VERS and TRUT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VERS.
VERS has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for VERS and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer